![]()
AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
|
|||||||
The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name. |
|||||||
STUDIA PHILOSOPHIA - Issue no. 2 / 2000 | |||||||
Article: |
TWO NEOPLATONIC SOURCES OF THE MEANING OF ESSE. THE MEDIEVAL DISTINCTION BETWEEN ID QUOD EST AND ESSE. Authors: ANDREI BERESCHI. |
||||||
Abstract: A well-known fragment from De Hebdomadibus of A. M. S. T. Boethius is the place of the theoretic distinction between being and that what it is. Boethius was saying in that passage that good is an essential atribgute for all that was created and he supreimposed the difference Creator – creature over the now-so-called ontological difference between esse and id quod est. The aim of our study is to show how both the difference and the superimposition imply a couple of neoplatonic sources and how those hiden sources were decisive for the meaning of being in the mediaeval ontological debates over esse and id quod est. | |||||||
![]() |
|||||||
![]() |