The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary

The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name.

  
       
         
    STUDIA PHILOLOGIA - Issue no. 2 / 2007  
         
  Article:   BOOK REVIEWS: VIOREL HODIŞ, ARTICLES AND STUDIES, RISOPRINT ED., CLUJ-NAPOCA, 2006, 2 VOL. (280 P., 288 P.).

Authors:  . 		 
       
         
  Abstract:  Articles and Studies by Viorel Hodiş, published in December 2006 by the Risoprint Publishing House, includes two volumes in which the author succeeds in reuniting the results of a forty-year career research, as he confesses in Instead of a Foreword. The first volume, Relaţia de echivalenţă (logic-semantic-sintatctic) / The Relation of Equivalence (logical - semantic- syntactic), contains, in its three chapters [N.N.], a retrospective selection of the articles published in various specialized periodicals. The first section (Echivalenţa semantico-sintactică a termenilor raportului apozitiv / The Semantic- Syntactic Equivalence of the Terms of Appositive Relation) begins with the article entitled The Apposition and its Initial Term are Semantically Equivalent Items, published in Cercetări de lingvistică , year XI, no 1, Cluj, 1966. The study deals with the problem raised by the special relation between apposition (the appositive clause, respectively) and its antecedent. The author insists upon the similarities between the appositive relation and that of coordination, stating that what distinguishes them is a criterion outside the area of syntax, namely the equivalent notional-semantical content in the case of apposition. Reference is made (in the footnotes) to two partially valid syntactic criteria: (1) the appositive relation (A – A’) is realized exclusively at a paratactic level, while the relation of coordination is also frequently achieved through junction; (2) the terms of the coordination can be syntactically different units, while those of the appositive relation are always syntactic equivalents.  
         
     
         
         
      Back to previous page