![]()
AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
|
|||||||
The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name. |
|||||||
STUDIA OECONOMICA - Issue no. 1 / 2009 | |||||||
Article: |
DO SOCIALLY CONSCIOUS COMPANIES PROVIDE BETTER FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE ? AN EXPLORATORY STUDY. Authors: PIETER BUYS, SURIKA VAN ROOYEN, PIETER BOSMAN. |
||||||
Abstract: The 1987 report on “Our Common Future” by the World Commission on Environment and Development gave rise to the concept of sustainable development. However, the question remained as to what exactly is sustainable development? In recent years, the concept of sustainable development has gained popularity with its three focus areas of economic, social and environmental development, also known as the triple bottom line (TBL). The primary question under consideration was to consider whether socially conscious companies may be able to provide better financial performance and thus value creation opportunities than other companies. Several international studies have returned mixed answers to this question. This exploratory study laid the foundation for a project into possible relationships between social responsibility and corporate performances in a South African context. The study focussed on industrial companies listed in the JSE Top 40 Index, which were classified into one of two groups, namely those that adopted socially responsible reporting guidelines, and those who did not. Given the limitations of this constraint study, the analysis and comparison of the financial performance indicators of these two groups indicated that companies in the targeted group which adopted such reporting guidelines, returned better financial results than the comparative group which did not adopt these guidelines. JEL Classification: M10, M14, M41 Keywords: corporate social responsibility, shareholders, stakeholders, sustainable development |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||