AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary
The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name.
Authors: DUMITRU BALEA.
DOI: 10.24193/SUBBiur.68(2023).3.4
Article history: Available online January 10, 2024.
©2023 Studia UBB Iurisprudentia. Published by Babeş-Bolyai University.
pp. 101-119
VIEW PDF
FULL PDF
The present study analyses Decision no. 1798/2023 of the High Court of Cassation and Justice, having as its main object the plaintiff’s claim to obtain legal penalty interests applied to compensation established in a different tortious civil liability process. The problem that arose was to determine the start date of the penalties: is it the date the court is invested with the tortious liability action or the date of the final decision? The discussion is relevant, given that due to practical inertia sometimes the courts oblige the tortfeasor to pay penal legal interest from the date the court is invested until the payment is concluded. Is the latter a correct solution? We will try to answer this question by analysing the state of the facts, the court’s solution and presenting our own view regarding the problem.
Keywords: tortious liability; punitive damages; legal penalty interests; unquestionable, liquid and due debt; enforcement order.
