AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary
The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name.
Authors: MIHAIL UDROIU.
DOI: 10.24193/SUBBiur.68(2023).2.6
Article history: Available online 23.12.2023.
©2023 Studia UBB Iurisprudentia. Published by Babeş-Bolyai University.
pp. 146-168
VIEW PDF
FULL PDF
Abstract: The a posteriori control of the legality of the technical surveillance involves a verification of all the requirements of legality and proportionality of the interference in the right to private life after its approval by the judge of rights and liberties or the execution. In this framework, I presented the way in which the Romanian Constitutional Court assessed that the ex post verification of the technical supervision should be ensured, as well as the new procedural regulation highlighting the person who can make the complaint, the judicial bodies competent to resolve it and the object of the preliminary chamber judge''s analysis. Likewise, multiple hypotheses of interpretation of new procedures were highlighted in order to highlight some application difficulties.
Keywords: technical supervision, legality, resolution of the case
