AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary
The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name.
Authors: SEPTIMIU PUȚ.
DOI: 10.24193/SUBBiur.65(2020).2.3
Published Online: 2020-07-31
Published Print: 2020-07-31
pp. 77-102
FULL PDF
In accordance with its nature and specificity, the federal sports movement has progressively institutionalized a closed-type justice system whose purpose is to resolve most sports disputes within it, according to the procedural rules established by domestic courts. The reasons for such a purpose are multiple and legitimate: understanding the nature and specifics of the dispute, the duration of the proceedings, avoiding judicial fees, the possibility of choosing the judge, etc. Sports justice today presents itself as a jurisdictional system based on both legal and sporting norms, governed by the classical principles of a fair trial and consisting of all jurisdictional commissions with genuine powers in sports juris-dictio.
Keywords: private justice, sports litigation, fair trial, Sports law.
