AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary
The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name.
Authors: OANA BUGNAR-COLDEA.
DOI: 10.24193/SUBBiur.67(2022).1.4
Article history: Available online July 25, 2022; Available print August 25, 2022.
©2022 Studia UBB Iurisprudentia. Published by Babeş-Bolyai University.
pp. 210-226
VIEW PDF
FULL PDF
Abstract: This material contains an analysis of a criminal court`s decision regarding tax evasion offences, a decision relevant from the perspective of the applicability of the provisions regarding the tax amnesty provided by Romanian OUG no. 69/2020 and of the consequences that they generate in terms of criminal liability. The decision is crucial as it answers relevant questions to judicial practice, such as the extent to which the tax amnesty covers accessory tax obligations arising from the criminal offence; if the criminal court can consider that the provisions of OUG no. 69/2020 are applicable in the absence of a tax decision regarding the accessories and if it can do so outside an enforceable title or only after the finality of the court decision that decides the civil action, respectively if the provisions of art. 10 para. (11) of Romanian Law no. 241/2005 are applicable when the defendant does not pay the accessory fiscal obligations, but regarding them, the fiscal amnesty intervened. In the content of the material, I, therefore, presented the relevant factual situation, the court’s solution, as well as my own reasoned opinion regarding the solution given by the judges invested with solving the case.
Key words: tax evasion, accessory tax obligations, tax amnesty, impunity, civil action
