The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary

The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name.

 
       
         
    STUDIA IURISPRUDENTIA - Issue no. 1 / 2013  
         
  Article:   CONSTRUCTION RELATED CRIMES IN THE ROMANIAN LAW NO. 10/1995 REGARDING QUALITY IN CONSTRUCTION / INFRACŢIUNILE PREVĂZUTE ÎN CADRUL LEGII NR. 10/1995 PRIVIND CALITATEA ÎN CONSTRUCŢII.

Authors:  .
 
       
         
  Abstract:  

Construction Related Crimes in the Romanian Law no. 10/1995 Regarding Quality in Construction. The current article has set its aim to surpass the Romanian doctrine’s standstill concerning construction related crimes, especially by analyzing the manner in which other legal systems have dealt with the possible issues surrounding this area. The study starts by exploring the origins and nomenclature of Law no. 10/1995 regarding quality in construction. Throughout this stage, the author points out the pros, cons and possible interpretation quandaries of the current legal text. Moving on, the author analyzes the criminal provision stipulated in article 31 of the Law at hand, alongside providing a short glimpse of some analgous European legal provisions During this phase, dismantling other authors’ thought-to-be obsolete oppinions on the matter becomes the writer’s main concern. After scrutinizing all the basic issues surrounding this article, the breakdown of the criminal provisions of article 32 enters the spotlight. Both during and subsequent to the examination of these two articles, the author is aptly devoted to proposing a series of compulsory changes that would remodel Law nr. 10/1995 into a suitable overseer of quality in construction. Currently, this Law’s criminal provisions are seldom applied, because of the legislator’s ambiguous choice of syntax, the high penalties, and the jumbled action-result coupling.

Cuvinte cheie: construcţii, anexe gospodăreşti, proiectare, expertizare, verificare, continuarea a lucrărilor, lucrări executate necorespunzător, organe de control, valoare socială

Key-Words: buildings, appended structures, project designing, building expertise and ascertainment, continued work on a construction site, improper buildings, overseers, social value

 
         
     
         
         
      Back to previous page