AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
|
|||||||
Rezumat articol ediţie STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI În partea de jos este prezentat rezumatul articolului selectat. Pentru revenire la cuprinsul ediţiei din care face parte acest articol, se accesează linkul din titlu. Pentru vizualizarea tuturor articolelor din arhivă la care este autor/coautor unul din autorii de mai jos, se accesează linkul din numele autorului. |
|||||||
STUDIA PHILOSOPHIA - Ediţia nr.1 din 2013 | |||||||
Articol: |
DILEME MORALE ÎN CERCETĂRILE SOCIOLOGICE / MORAL DILEMMAS IN SOCIOLOGICAL RESEARCH. Autori: . |
||||||
Rezumat: The hypothetical case discussed in this paper deals with a situation in which a researcher, working for a research institute, publicly disclosed scientific results affecting negatively a political party, that was an important client of the institute, and thus brought the economic integrity of the institute into peril. After analyzing the case from the divergent perspectives of the main stakeholders involved (the instituteʼs management, the researcher in question and the political party), we conclude that autonomy of research in the field of social sciences is possible only if political practices assume the conditions of moral responsibility. Key words: Autonomy of scientific research, Political instrumentalization, Conflict of interests, Professional responsibilities, Analysis of stakeholders decision-making |
|||||||