AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
Rezumat articol ediţie STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI
În partea de jos este prezentat rezumatul articolului selectat. Pentru revenire la cuprinsul ediţiei din care face parte acest articol, se accesează linkul din titlu. Pentru vizualizarea tuturor articolelor din arhivă la care este autor/coautor unul din autorii de mai jos, se accesează linkul din numele autorului.
Autori: KORNEL GHIRHINY.
DOI: 10.24193/SUBBiur.62(2017).2.10
Published Online: 2017-06-15
Published Print: 2017-06-30
pp. 95-101
VIEW PDF: THE RELEVANCY OF QUESTIONING ON THE SCENE IN CASE OF EXHIBITS
If questioning on the scene is performed correctly, however it – recalls the memories of a person – seems to be a human data source, we need to lay down, it is more than that. In those cases, when we get uniqe informations, which are only known by the people who were there at the crime, and the previous inspections are reinforcing about it with material evidences, and it reflects on the spot, then it is a material reflection of a special personal evidence. In these case, we think, the material reflection of a special (unique) personal evidence produces a new, combinated evidence. If our thread is correct, we think, we need to rethink categorizing questioning on the scene as a personal evidence. By the introducing it is clear to see, that this procedural act has a personal nature, but its role mutated by the material reflections, its effect is unquestionable.
Keywords: pyramid model of forensics, questioning, procedural acts, analyzing skills, tactics, criminal proceedings.
