AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary
The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name.
Authors: .
But in fact the counter-arguments of relativism are continuous, once they support the dominant policies. This theoretical legitimization of status quo is important: the concrete practice to minimize global injustice depends upon the permanent counteraction to relativist arguments that are certainly ideological. The theoretical debate concerning global injustice contains just these arguments and counteraction, global justice theory being a main participant in debates. But, even with its contrary position to that of relativist standpoints, the present global justice theory does not have enough explanatory power to win over its partners of dialogue. One cause of the wasted time in front of the dangerous facts of global injustice consists just in the inertia of the epistemological “doubts” concerning the phenomenon of social and global injustice. And an implicit form of this inertia manifests through the present global justice theory that is based on the principle of “donating to the poor”.
The paper focuses on some theoretical realizations. In this respect, to remember the redistribution of responsibilities at the level of corporations, the Human Development Index and the Human Development Reports, the concept of Gross National Happiness and the Conferences related to it, the concepts and measurements of values and human rights would not be superfluous. All these theories, concepts, efforts are considered as steps toward global justice. However, there are also more challenging standpoints regarding the problem.
Keywords: global justice theory, global injustice, time, present capitalism, ontology of human society.
