The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary

The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name.

  
       
         
    STUDIA PHILOSOPHIA - Issue no. 2 / 2013  
         
  Article:   COULD BODY PARTS BE CONSIDERED PROPERTY? BIOETHICAL, ANTHROPOLOGICAL AND METAPHYSICAL ISSUES.

Authors:  . 		 
       
         
  Abstract:  The status of one’s body parts in relation to transplantation has been debated among several possibilities: as commercial (individual) property, as surplus (waste), as non-commercial gift and as (community) resource. In this paper, we argue that, although all the above-mentioned options have been embraced by various legal and ethical systems, there is no way of escaping the epistemological limitations and contradictions that each position entails. The reason is that all claims concerning one’s body parts are metaphysical in nature and, as such, one cannot decide based on rational arguments in favor of any of them. We use the Kantian understanding of the distinction between „metaphysical ideas” and „intellectual concepts” and show that his distinction is useful in articulating the status of body parts. The Kantian solutions to antinomies are used to argue in favor of a “moral compromise” between four possibilities: that of property, waste, commodity or community resource.

Keywords: Ethics, Transplantation, Body parts, Metaphysics, Kant 		 
         
     
         
         
      Back to previous page