STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS

AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN ROMÂNA ENGLISH INFOKIOSK CONTACT ADDRESSES SPECIAL ACCESS SUBSCRIPTION FORM NEWSLETTER & DOWNLOAD NEWEST ISSUES THIS YEAR ISSUES ALL ISSUES IN ARCHIVE FIND IN ARCHIVE HISTORY TODAY SCOP & OBJECTIVES THE TEAM


	The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name.


	STUDIA PHILOSOPHIA - Issue no. 2 / 2013

	Article:	SOME CONSIDERATIONS CONCERNING THE PROBLEM OF THE IMAGE CONSTITUTION IN HUSSERL’S PHENOMENOLOGY / QUELQUES CONSIDÉRATIONS SUR LE PROBLÈME DE LA CONSTITUTION DE L’IMAGE DANS LA PHÉNOMÉNOLOGIE HUSSERLIENNE. Authors: .


	Abstract: SOME CONSIDERATIONS CONCERNING THE PROBLEM OF THE IMAGE CONSTITUTION IN HUSSERL’S PHENOMENOLOGY. My aim in this paper is to analyze the way in which Edmund Husserl deals with the problem of the constitution of image in his writings. The difference between a common thing and a work of art lies in the fact that the ‘thing’ is submitted as an object to perception, while the work of art is the product of the human capacity called imagination or fantasy (Phantasie). Therefore, the difference between perception (which is an objectifying act) and imagination (which refers to a mental representation) is the fundamental difference Husserl operates with in his analysis of the phenomenological problem of the image building. I also want to show that Husserl’s analysis of the constitution of the image is fundamental in the understanding of the work of art (aesthetic phenomena including) and of its difference from a common thing. From the point of view of the History of Philosophy, the Husserlian analysis presupposes the overcoming of the classical opposition between subject and object, and the aesthetic experience is one of the (privileged) ways through which this overcoming can be achieved. Keywords: fantasy (Phantasie), imagination, perception, image building, real/unreal (irreal), neutrality modification, subject/object.




			Back to previous page