The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary

The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name.

 
       
         
    STUDIA OECONOMICA - Issue no. 1 / 2017  
         
  Article:   ALTERNATIVE VIEWS ON THE PARTICIPATION OF NON-EURO ZONE COUNTRIES AT THE BANK UNION.

Authors:  .
 
       
         
  Abstract:  Published Online: 2017-04

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/subboec-2017-0001

VIEW PDF: ALTERNATIVE VIEWS ON THE PARTICIPATION OF NON-EURO ZONE COUNTRIES AT THE BANK UNION


The reformation of the bank systems’ regulation and supervision in The European Union was founded on a macroprudential approach to monitor systemic risks and the vulnerabilities in a more effective way. Considered as the backbone of the new macroprudential supervision architecture, the Bank Union raises intense debates among the catching up economies. The fact that there are few studies on the costs and benefits of joining the Bank Union for the Central and Eastern European countries, explains the different views of the decision makers concerning this issue. The study stresses the manner in which macroprudential policies were implemented in Romania, as a particular case among the CEE countries, and the extent of their contribution to mitigating vulnerabilities and maintaining financial stability. The paper summarises the main arguments in favour of joining the Bank Union by emphasising the Romanian monetary authorities’ stance compared to those of the neighbouring CEE countries.

Keywords: macroprudential policies, Bank Union, stability, reforms
 
         
     
         
         
      Back to previous page