AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary
The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name.
Authors: IULIA OPREA.
DOI: 10.24193/SUBBiur.65(2020).3.2
Published Online: 2021-03-09
Published Print: 2021-03-09
pp. 55-90
VIEW PDF
FULL PDF
ABSTRACT.
The power of attorney, as a judicial mechanism, has enjoyed a broad applicability for the past centuries due to its undeniable utility, reaching, at the moment, a level of necessity in the professional and casual routine. However, a great amount of the scientific literature that discuss this subject focus on the analysis of the mandate agreement, as a source for the power of attorney, without studying the legal nature of this prerogative. That is why the purpose of the present paper, avoiding any claim of completeness, is to scan the representation as a species, closely analysing its genus: the power. The pragmatism of our approach is revealed by the fact that the study of representation takes place in the context of the matters in which it is mostly used and that is the common civil law and the derogatory commercial law.
Keywords: Power, representation, mandate, administration, consent, relativity of effects, opposability, administrator of the company, revocation.
