The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary

The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name.

 
       
         
    STUDIA IURISPRUDENTIA - Issue no. 2 / 2010  
         
  Article:   ARTICOLE : EXPROPRIEREA DE FAPT. UN COMENTARIU AL HOTĂRÂRII CEDO ÎN CAUZA BURGHELEA C. ROMÂNIA.

Authors:  .
 
       
         
  Abstract:  Factual Expropriation – Remarks on the ECHR Judegment in the Case Burghelea vs. Romania. In january 2009, The European Court of Human Rights passed its judgement in the case of Burghelea v. Romania. In the judgement, the Court noted for the first time a case in which Romania violated a persons right to protection of property consequently to a factual expropriation. The term of “factual expropriation” is currently unknown to romanian law. However, the mere ocuurance of a factual expropriation is not compatible with the internal Fundamental Law and the relevant provisions in the European Convention that grant the right to protection of property. Regarding this aspect, the Court clearly stated that it is absolutely necessary for the state to urgenly modify the romanian law regarding the expropriation for public wellfare. Namely, the law should clearly impose the state the obligation to buy the expropriated gods.

Keywords: property, factual expropriation, European Court of Human Rights, privation of property, effects of ECHR judgements
 
         
     
         
         
      Back to previous page