The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary

The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name.

 
       
         
    STUDIA HISTORIA - Issue no. 2 / 2021  
         
  Article:   FROM THE RUSSIAN OCCUPATION TO THE REIGN OF ALEXANDRU D. GHICA. THE FEATURES OF A POLITICAL TRANSITION.

Authors:  COSMIN MIHUŢ, CRISTIAN PLOSCARU.
 
       
         
  Abstract:  DOI: 10.24193/subbhist.2021.2.04

Article history: Received 2.11.2021; Revised 7.12.2021;
Accepted 28.12.2021; Available online 13.04.2022.
pp. 77-98

VIEW PDF

FULL PDF

Abstract: The appointment of the Princes of Moldavia and Wallachia presented Russian officials with serious dilemmas, whether they were the leaders of the Empireʼs foreign policy or of the occupation administration. In the end, a solution was adopted – the selection of the Princes by the Porte from a short list of candidates proposed by Russia – in line with Russiaʼs strategic interests regarding the Ottoman Empire as a whole and despite Pavel Kiselevʼs proposals that the occupation should be prolonged or, in a transitional phase, that the civilian administration of the Princes should operate in parallel with a Russian military administration. The selection of Alexandru Dimitrie Ghica as the main candidate for Wallachia and his rapid investiture by the Sultan have several explanations, including his political profile convenient for both Powers, his activity as minister and head of the militia, his personal relation with Pavel Kiselev and his access to the sums of money required for his investiture in Constantinople. However, his insufficient political prestige in relation to the countryʼs great boyar families, his image as a Prince submissive to the Russian will, skillfully used by his opponents, and the large debts he had accumulated, which he could not pay without generating several resounding financial scandals linked to the leasing of state revenues, were likely to herald the political crisis of the following years, the success of the opposition in undermining his regime and, finally, his dismissal after only eight years of rule.

Keywords: Statutory regime, Pavel Kiselev, investiture, Alexandru Dimitrie Ghica, financial obligations.
 
         
     
         
         
      Back to previous page