![]()
AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
|
|||||||
The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name. |
|||||||
STUDIA EUROPAEA - Issue no. 3 / 2008 | |||||||
Article: |
THE FIRST VETO OF GENERAL DE GAULLE CONCERNING THE FIRST BRITISH CANDIDATURE IN EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES / LE PREMIER VETO DU GENERAL DE GAULLE A LA CANDIDATURE D’ADHESION DE LA GRANDE-BRETAGNE DANS LES COMMUNAUTES EUROPEENNES. Authors: CLAUDIA-VALENTINA GÎDEA. |
||||||
Abstract: This paper attempts to analyze the position of General Charles de Gaulle concerning the first British candidature in European Communities.Great Britain refuses to participate after the Second World War at the European construction, and from economical and political reasons it changes its position in the sixties. For Charles de Gaulle the British involvement in business affairs would compromise his European policy. French president, de Gaulle, has taken this decision motivated by economical, political and military aspects. Another reason not directly expressed by general for rejecting Great Britain, is the American immixture in the European problems. In this article I don’t look for the responsible, but I make an incursion in the history of European construction. By the SWOT analysis I want to focus on strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats of both actors. Key words: veto, European construction, United States, derogation, arguments |
|||||||
![]() |
|||||||
![]() |