![]()
AMBIENTUM BIOETHICA BIOLOGIA CHEMIA DIGITALIA DRAMATICA EDUCATIO ARTIS GYMNAST. ENGINEERING EPHEMERIDES EUROPAEA GEOGRAPHIA GEOLOGIA HISTORIA HISTORIA ARTIUM INFORMATICA IURISPRUDENTIA MATHEMATICA MUSICA NEGOTIA OECONOMICA PHILOLOGIA PHILOSOPHIA PHYSICA POLITICA PSYCHOLOGIA-PAEDAGOGIA SOCIOLOGIA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA THEOLOGIA CATHOLICA LATIN THEOLOGIA GR.-CATH. VARAD THEOLOGIA ORTHODOXA THEOLOGIA REF. TRANSYLVAN
|
|||||||
The STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI issue article summary The summary of the selected article appears at the bottom of the page. In order to get back to the contents of the issue this article belongs to you have to access the link from the title. In order to see all the articles of the archive which have as author/co-author one of the authors mentioned below, you have to access the link from the author's name. |
|||||||
STUDIA EUROPAEA - Issue no. 2 / 2001 | |||||||
Article: |
THE GOOD, THE BAD, AND THE UGLY RATIONALITY, CULTURE AND INSTITUTIONS IN COMPARATIVE POLITICS. Authors: ALIN FUMURESCU. |
||||||
Abstract: ‘What’s time? If you hadn’t asked, I would have known. Since you’ve asked me, I’m not quite sure, any longer’, said St. Augustin. When it comes to define ‘institutions’ the political scientists found themselves in the same situation. The institutions are used almost everywhere: from the studies of the origin of the state to the discussion of corporatism; from the literature on legislatures to the analysis of the breakdown of democratic regimes; from the congressional studies to the modernizing of the intellectual transformation; and so on . Because of its ambiguity, the concept of institution became such a big umbrella that almost everything seems to fit in. Being so, it is no surprise if practically every political scientist would agree with such a statement as ‘institutions matter’. | |||||||
![]() |
|||||||
![]() |