| |
Rezumat articol ediţie STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABEŞ-BOLYAI
În partea de jos este prezentat rezumatul articolului selectat. Pentru revenire la cuprinsul ediţiei din care face parte acest articol, se accesează linkul din titlu. Pentru vizualizarea tuturor articolelor din arhivă la care este autor/coautor unul din autorii de mai jos, se accesează linkul din numele autorului. |
|
| |
Rezumat: The purpose of this inquiry is to better understand Martin Heidegger’s principle of sufficient reason as discussed during the 1955-56 lecture-cycle, entitled Der Satz vom Grund. Here Heidegger dealt with such ideas as weil, Weile, verweilen, which all denote stillness, contemplation and an acknowledgment of “what is as it is”. He set these ideas against reason’s need for _expression. This need appears in the idea of Weil as a “cause”, also in the conjunctive “because”. The verbs weile, weilen denote enduring time of introspection and self-assessment, as in in sich innehalten, in der Ruhe.
Heidegger’s Weil introduces a tautological understanding of the man-world relation, which includes fearful astonishment (erstauntes Erschrecken) about everything that is, not because its nature is not always known, but because of its sheer existence. Suppressing this astonishment would result in a non-awareness of the authentic meaning of something that is itself, fed by such terms as cause and reason, and ultimately the technical thinking apparent in the term Ge-Stell.
Heidegger supported his views with references to the concepts of first beginning (erster Anfang) and the Greek astonishment (thaumazein). They aid the search for certainly of knowledge, which ultimately comes to fruition in Leibniz’s “principle of sufficient reasoning.” In this search, to avoid the constant need for reasoning and to best value “that what is, as it is”, a mental jump (Sprung) is needed, a jump not toward to abyss (Ab-Grund) but a jump beneath thinking in terms of reason, to that level where man finds himself, where identity becomes itself (worin de Selbigkeit selber weiss) Ereignis. And Ereignis is the main structure in Heidegger’s thinking, following the so-called Kehre.
The present research aims at unvailing and enforcing the Denken-Sein-Sprache triad (Thinking-Being-Language) as the key to understanding Heidegger’s late philosophical thinking.
|
|
